next up previous
Next: Appendix 2 Up: Spin Stabilized Magnetic Levitation Previous: Materials to Experiment With

Appendix 1


Linear Precessing Model

To derive the upper spin limit for the top and some of the other dynamics, we need to go back to the equations of motion. While our computer solution of the equations of motion keeps terms to second order, the upper spin frequency condition can be derived from the linearized equations. We write equations (1) and (2) in terms of our field expansion. For the z-component we have
equation169
The term in the brackets is zero at the levitation point. The top is trapped in z and oscillates at a frequency
equation177

displaymath722

Defining tex2html_wrap_inline738 so that tex2html_wrap_inline610 changes sign when tex2html_wrap_inline482 changes sign, the other equations are
equation184

displaymath723

displaymath724

displaymath725
We change to complex variables tex2html_wrap_inline744 and u=x+iy and solve by substituting tex2html_wrap_inline748 and tex2html_wrap_inline750. The result is a cubic equation for tex2html_wrap_inline752. The condition that the motion be bounded is that all three roots of the cubic are real. From this the condition for stability can be derived and is tex2html_wrap_inline754 where
equation211

displaymath726

displaymath727

displaymath728

The function tex2html_wrap_inline756 is nearly constant and ranges between 0.77 and 1. It is approximated by the simpler function
displaymath729
within 0.36%. These relations determine the upper spin limit for stable operation. The absolute upper spin limit, setting tex2html_wrap_inline758, is
equation230
The analytical results have been confirmed by computer simulation of the complete equations (see appendix 2) and by experiment within 20%.